A. Approval of minutes of the November 30, 2004 meeting.
B. Flexible Appointment Structures for Faculty: Kal Alston suggested to the committee that
we may need to do another survey as the faculty response earlier did not seem very
representative of the entire faculty on campus.
1. Reginald Alston gave a background of the involvement of the Committee on Equal
Opportunity with this project. He emphasized that the two committees should be
kept abreast of each other's work. He also informed that the members of the
Committee on Equal Opportunity want to know the larger aim of the Flexible
Appointment Structures for Faculty. They need to be apprised of certain issues like
pay increments, conversion from part-time to full-time, etc.
2. Reginald Alston reiterated the importance of such discussions and joint meetings, as
they are extremely helpful in pre-proposal brainstorming sessions.
3. Kal Alston raised her concerns that the survey had deliberately stepped back from
targeting specific issues and provide us with only broad issues. She emphasized that
the committee needs to decide whether we require a more coherent analysis of data
and identify the core areas for policymaking.
4. Kal Alston also suggested that we can request Cheryl Bullock to draft a summary/
synopsis of the core issues to be analyzed, strengths and weaknesses of the survey.
5. Kal Alston also brought to light that the American Association of University
Professors (AAUP) monitors abuses against faculty, issues of freedom, protection
of tenure rights, etc., and they should be consulted to see if they have any policy
statements in this regard.
6. Kal Alston informed the committee that she will be attending the American Council
on Education's (ACE) conference and will gather information that is more relevant
on what is available to the public.
7. Reginald Alston informed that other committees on campus have expressed their
desire to have a voice on this topic.
8. Kal Alston suggested that we can have a meeting to share information and ideas.
She also emphasized that we need to study the survey in detail to get future
directions of work.
9. Reginald Alston told the committee that the Committee on Equal Opportunity had
discussed about redoing the survey and concluded that it will be a cumbersome
process to get it done electronically. It was suggested that a shorter version could
be conducted again and not electronically.
10. Kal Alston expressed that the survey can be conducted electronically also but the
delivery system has to be in place.
11. Victoria Gonzalez suggested that we could assess the shortcomings and strengths
of the survey and devise a shorter version.
12. Kal Alston reiterated the need for narrowing down the options and making it
more concise. The survey can be routed through the Provost's Office.
13. A discussion was held on the survey responses and the committee members
analyzed some key responses and crucial issues.
14. Kal Alston suggested that the presentation of the survey needs to be fine-tuned.
Also, the number of options to a question needs to be reduced and narrow them
down for better understanding. Kal Alston volunteered to request Cheryl Bullock
to look into the matter and report to the committee in the next meeting.
15. Kal Alston also suggested that she and the secretary, Mansi Sachdev, will study
the related policies and efforts in the Big Ten universities. Kal Alston also
emphasized that we need to take this issue further with other committees on
campus.
C. Mentoring: Kal Alston reiterated the need to devise recommendations to implement the
mentoring program.
D. Kal Alston informed the committee that we need three volunteers for three projects so that we
can furnish our annual report.